BLOG

Employees spend 1.8 hours every day searching information

April 2, 2025

According to a McKinsey report, employees spend 1.8 hours every day searching and gathering information.

  • Employees seek and acquire information for an average of 9.3 hours each week, or 1.8 hours per day, according to a McKinsey analysis. In other words, companies employ five people, but only four of them show up for work; the fifth is off looking for answers but not adding anything of value.
  • According to Interact, "employees waste 19.8% of business time, or one day per working week, looking for information to do their job effectively."
  • According to IDC data, "the knowledge worker spends about 2.5 hours per day, or roughly 30% of the workday, searching for information." Sixty percent of company executives believed that their employees were unable to find the information they needed because of time constraints and a lack of knowledge about how to find information.

 

Your Organization Has a Knowledge Problem: Why AI Can’t Help Until You Fix It

Advanced AI tools, such as GPT-4, are transforming business operations through customer support automation and process optimization. However, they face challenges with complex, organization-specific queries due to fragmented knowledge across systems and their reliance on key employees. To fully leverage AI's potential, a robust knowledge management strategy is essential.

This article discusses the structural limitations that hinder AI effectiveness in specialized contexts, emphasizing that general-purpose models cannot meet specific business needs without access to proprietary knowledge. Achieving success requires designing systems that effectively connect unique data to AI’s capabilities, rather than expecting AI to intuitively understand the intricacies of a business.

Knowledge Gaps Limiting AI in Organizations

Effective knowledge management is crucial for maximizing AI's value in organizations. Fragmented information impedes AI's ability to deliver relevant insights, revealing three key knowledge gaps:

 

  1. Scattered Information Across Systems: Critical data, such as process documentation and policies, is often dispersed across various platforms (e.g., Confluence, SharePoint). This inconsistency hinders AI from providing contextually relevant responses, leading to generic suggestions when specific procedures are undocumented.
  2. Undocumented Institutional Knowledge: Long-term employees possess valuable insights into company history and practices that often go unrecorded. This undocumented knowledge is lost when employees leave, resulting in AI lacking the nuance needed for effective recommendations.
  3. Departmental Silos of Specialized Knowledge: Specialized knowledge within departments (e.g., compliance, customer service, R&D) often remains isolated, preventing AI from leveraging cross-functional insights. Without access to this information, AI responses may lack accuracy and relevance.

A structured knowledge management system is essential to bridge these gaps

A structured knowledge management system is essential to bridge these gaps, enabling AI to provide more valuable and informed responses by connecting rich, specific insights rather than relying solely on general data.

 

Challenges of AI Language Models with Business-Specific Knowledge

AI language models like GPT-4 excel in generating coherent responses but struggle with business-specific contexts due to their training on broad datasets rather than nuanced organizational practices. Key limitations include:

  1. Lack of Built-In Business Context: AI models do not access a company’s internal documents or historical data, preventing them from understanding unique workflows and industry-specific needs. While they can offer high-level insights, tailored recommendations are not possible without proprietary information.
  2. Struggles with Complex, Context-Specific Queries: Even when provided with context, AI may falter on organization-specific questions. In the absence of a robust internal knowledge base, it may resort to generic “best practices” rather than specific processes.
  3. Generalized Responses for Specialized Needs: AI models often provide responses lacking the actionable detail necessary for particular industries. This is especially problematic in sectors with regulatory requirements, where reliance on general AI knowledge can lead to inaccuracies or compliance issues.

Expecting AI to deliver detailed and relevant insights without addressing these knowledge gaps is often unrealistic for organizations.

Conclusion: The Importance of Knowledge Management for AI Success

For businesses to realize the full potential of AI, knowledge management must be integral to their AI strategy. Without structured access to relevant information, AI models will remain constrained, delivering generic responses based on external training data.

The future of AI in business hinges on connecting AI with the unique insights within each organization. By investing in effective knowledge management, companies can enhance AI performance and empower teams with accurate, context-driven insights that improve decision-making and foster growth.